# Clean-room reconstruction of NEWMAN_GLOBAL_OBJECT/1.0 This is the experiment for frozen unarchived `G6_RELEASE/1.1`. It is not another construction step and not a request for a G₇. The authoritative input list is `CLEANROOM.json`. An optional ZIP mirror may exist; it is transport, not a required container. Two profiles: - **certificate_replay** — specifications, certificates, and raw data. - **independent_reconstruction** — papers, specifications, and raw data. No reference implementations, run logs, canonical outputs, or derived evidence files. This is the stronger demonstration. Do not use the general homepage as evaluator input: it embeds reference source. `CLEANROOM.json` is the authoritative file list (per-file SHA-256, byte length, retrieval URL). An optional ZIP mirror `G6_CLEANROOM_INPUT_v1.1.zip` may be used as transport and is not required. The independent_reconstruction profile excludes reference implementations, run logs, canonical outputs, and derived evidence files. ## Instruction to an independent implementer > Implement NEWMAN_GLOBAL_OBJECT/1.0 from the published specification > and the contracts in this package. Do not consult any supplied > reference implementation. ## Required protocol Printing the publicly known hash `92187a21…` is not success. The implementation must **derive** the intermediate evidence, then construct the canonical record. 1. **Parse the contracts.** Read `CLASS_I_CUBATURE/1.0` and `NEWMAN_GLOBAL_OBJECT/1.0` from JSON (preferred) or the `.txt` key=value copies. Confirm `cubature_frequency_max = 9` and `first_mismatch = 42189065` as declared numbers. 2. **Hash the supplied artifacts.** SHA-256 of the frozen Omega manifest, `orbit_masses_f1_f9.csv`, and `f9_affine_family.csv` must equal the pins in `HASHING.json` / `EVIDENCE.json`. Construction of `evidence_sha256` is the four-field compact JSON documented there. 3. **Replay the 15-bit bridge.** On `D_15 = {0, …, 32767}`, `⌊λ d⌋ = ⌊Q d / S⌋` with the published `Q`, `S`, `L60`, `U60`. 4. **Establish d\*.** Show agreement at `42189064` and disagreement at `d* = 42189065`, using the continued-fraction least-denominator certificate (not a 42-million-state search). 5. **Replay cubature certificates.** Orbit masses for `1 ≤ f ≤ 9` sum to 1 on `|X_f| = 10f²+2` nodes; the f=9 affine family `W(t) = W^part + t W^null` with witness `t = 1/27` lies in `t_L < t < t_U`; orbit and node max–min members are positive and reconstructed from the published CSV. 6. **Check the declared interfaces** in `INTERFACES.json` (in particular the `ℚ(√5) → A_Ω` coefficient channel and cubature→SRSD transport). 7. **Only then** build the canonical no-space JSON record in the published key order, with `cubature_frequency_max` and `first_mismatch` as JSON numbers. 8. SHA-256 of that UTF-8 string must equal ``` 92187a21a7ad8ecef384eda3a654aaa49daf46a31422e168eb5871d218c949fa ``` and the four-field `evidence_sha256` must equal ``` 14fea940c9c117046b4bd5dd9c5c1774a9b1eb54b419897f92a3421d833c58e4 ``` A reconstruction that skips steps 2–6 and emits the known hash has failed the protocol even if the digest matches. ## What to read 1. `spec.html` / `Global_Mathematical_Object_Conformance_Specification_v1.0.tex` 2. `OBJECT.json`, `INTERFACES.json`, `PREDICATES.json`, `HASHING.json` 3. Machine contracts: JSON preferred; `.txt` is the live HTTP form 4. `data/orbit_masses_f1_f9.csv` and `data/f9_affine_family.csv` 5. Papers I–VI by DOI, or the copies under `papers/` 6. `proof/` certificates (not a verifier implementation) ## Success ``` published mathematical knowledge → formal specification → independent reconstruction of certificates and interfaces → same canonical record and same evidence digest ``` ## What this does not certify Mathematical theorem validity — rests on the proofs in the six source works; it is not certified by this conformance system. A matching hash is runtime conformance plus certificate replay, not a re-proof of Papers I–VI.