Skip to content

Supplementary written proof · 7 November 2026 · not a source paper

Explicit recovery-preserving joining theorem

Specified maps among marked scale, the affine scalar family, four geometric modes of the 600-cell network, the rational floor, valid witness records, and finite histories. The written proof is the hosted note. This page does not replace it.


Read JOINING_THEOREM.md for the definitions and the proof. SHA-256 7b3ff30da8055eb1ac88fee78ff0449b3e2102a0f1a9df9ac0b0e29349476070. The checker is verify_join.py. Its finite examples supplement the written argument. They are not the argument.

The note uses the 27 October illustrated draft, version 0.3, and says that drafting run did not retrieve the later v0.6 deposit. This page does not attribute the synthesis to Paper IX version 0.6. It does not rewrite the 27 October statement 306 ≤ ℓ* ≤ 360. It does not improve the preprint interval 307 ≤ ℓ* ≤ 352, and it does not compute that optimum. The 360-bit residue witness remains the recovery device in the note.

Stated identities

With φ=(1+5)/2\varphi=(1+\sqrt5)/2, λ=φ/(φ+π)\lambda=\varphi/(\varphi+\pi), Ωγ(t)=1+γ(t−1)\Omega_\gamma(t)=1+\gamma(t-1) for 0<γ<10<\gamma<1, and the note’s matrix M=13I+AM=13I+A, P=M/25P=M/25, q=Q/Sq=Q/S, D=25SD=25S.

Fγ(E(t,w))=E(Ωγ(t), γηw),η=(13+6φ)/25.\mathcal F_\gamma(E(t,w))=E(\Omega_\gamma(t),\,\gamma\eta w),\qquad \eta=(13+6\varphi)/25.

E(t,w)=t1+CwE(t,w)=t\mathbf 1+Cw uses the 120 unit 600-cell vertices as the rows of CC. The inverse on that image is the note’s mean and CT/30C^T/30. On the integer image EZ(t,x,z)=t1+C0x+C1zE_Z(t,x,z)=t\mathbf 1+C_0 x+C_1 z, with 2C=C0+φC12C=C_0+\varphi C_1,

MEZ(t,x,z)=EZ(25t, 13x+6z, 6x+19z).M E_Z(t,x,z)=E_Z(25t,\,13x+6z,\,6x+19z).

Full remainder records and modulo-eight records translate to each other on valid images, with the reduced output retained. For every finite horizon, the terminal state and the ordered modulo-eight witnesses recover the embedded source. Ideal λ\lambda and the rational coefficient qq are not the same floor: at n=2×1015n=2\times 10^{15} the certified ideal floor is 679899542689557 and the rational floor is 679899542689556.

What this archive reran

python3 verify_join.py and python3 -O verify_join.py on Python 3.10.21. Both exited 0. Stderr was empty. Both reports are the supplied bytes, SHA-256 d7528924f17109ac50bcac944acd5652a91e516924d9fb425398f576fab56c68. The checker’s pinned graph digest is 40bc6a1d52efab3d75cf343e65ac06b314f9c9c375fc02bf6d45bf6bb21f9529, the same fixture as the 27 October pages. It reports 120 positive leading minors of M−9IM-9I, the integer inverse certificate MN=NM=hIMN=NM=hI with h=4948372000h=4948372000, all 480 entries of AC=6φCAC=6\varphi C, and the Gram identity CTC=30I4C^TC=30I_4. A hash identifies bytes; it does not certify their mathematical correctness.

The supplied EXECUTION.json records Python 3.13.5 and eight rejected mutations. Those mutations were not rerun here. Three inputs named in that file — the version 0.3 PDF, the spectral-obstruction script, and a 4 November review ZIP — are not in this package and are not hosted. exact_F_max_computed\texttt{exact\_F\_max\_computed} and full_geometric_proof_in_lean\texttt{full\_geometric\_proof\_in\_lean} are false in the report.

Finite log replay

A separate ASCII log, treeOS_LOG/OMEGA-SRSD/1.0, is 24,941 characters and carries the same date. Its scope line says the profile is compatible with frozen SRSD and is not the archive or an installed system. That sentence is the log’s. This page does not turn it into an SRSD conformance review of Paper III.

The kernel source is saved verbatim as check.py, SHA-256 f31230bf8a31d45b91b637ba9aa2df42b9ec534c3a54baaca4205d90a077d5b7. The log binds that digest. This archive ran python3 check.py treeOS_LOG_OMEGA_Joining.json and the same command under python3 -O, on Python 3.10.21. Both exited 0, stderr was empty, and the stdout bytes match, SHA-256 6a20db4b8d0c8e35635dea4cd2e63c76fdbdb46bf4e728d319a1e1d5a9ce51cb. The verdict is INSTANCE_CHECKED for profile TREEOS-OMEGA-120/1. The matrix root is SHA-256 a6bfb755c12e57d493aedd43936ab10e96ceba5eea0ee2b01e289f72eed31423.

The replay recomputes the pinned graph, 120 positive leading minors, three geometric examples, six history steps, seven scalar examples, and two corruption rejections. A zero-budget decode is recorded as UNRESOLVED. formal_proof_assistant_executed is false. The written statements F1–F7 and G1–G9 stay in the log. They were not reviewed as proofs, and this verdict is not PROOF_CHECKED. The named parent log and the declared legacy source digest were not in the package. Those absences, and the three inputs named in the supplied execution record, are not required by the hosted positive checkers. G9 still does not prove the interval 307 ≤ ℓ* ≤ 352.

Evidence edition 1.1.0

The current package is evidence edition 1.1.0, 254,716 bytes, SHA-256 80d058b1807c4bb3b9ab7ba53163df3e18a5c0cb70ab2befb5cbbb2824f378e9. The earlier 26,470-byte ZIP stays at its original path. It is not replaced. Typed maps are in CONNECTIONS.json. The current index is relationship.json.

Replay from the extracted package: python3 verify.py --self-test and python3 -O verify.py --self-test. This archive ran both on Python 3.10.21. Both exited 0, stderr was empty, and the stdout bytes match, SHA-256 67794f3070ab6a83c7c446762e7a22e5918c8bb4a4e126419b7ae07f6e8c83c1. Status PASS. The stored reports inside the package name Python 3.12.14. Apart from that version field, the report body matches. The run rejected eleven corrupted cases, recovered 32 records and 18 history steps, and did not issue INSTANCE_CHECKED. formal_proof_assistant_executed is false. The written proofs in PROOF.md were not reviewed.

The compact sharing record is treeOS_LOG version 1.1, 3,276 bytes, SHA-256 15a2931cec9df25a7588417917f0817be75d3e9deb7dc5ba5337d163b3640b18. It has no embedded kernel. The INSTANCE_CHECKED receipt stays with the 24,941-character log and is not attached to this record. The frozen TGA 2.1 graph and atlas release 1.0 are unchanged.

Not claimed

  • That the scalar constants force this graph.
  • That the source works are one theory.
  • A bit optimum, a fast general decoder, or a 352-bit volume recertification.
  • Peer review, independent third-party reproduction, or a Lean proof.
  • That INSTANCE_CHECKED reviews the written proofs or Paper III.
  • A tenth Zenodo deposit. Nine deposits remain nine.

Related pages, kept separate: 600-cell signals, the 360-bit witness, and Paper IX.


Hosted joining-theorem files
FileBytesSHA-256
JOINING_THEOREM.md19,6157b3ff30da8055eb1ac88fee78ff0449b3e2102a0f1a9df9ac0b0e29349476070
verify_join.py18,611963fc485461f552c661b760d7af5b44074cb79d46beea2bbf296bbb146fcc519
results_normal.json6,694d7528924f17109ac50bcac944acd5652a91e516924d9fb425398f576fab56c68
results_optimized.json6,694d7528924f17109ac50bcac944acd5652a91e516924d9fb425398f576fab56c68
normal.log6,694d7528924f17109ac50bcac944acd5652a91e516924d9fb425398f576fab56c68
optimized.log6,694d7528924f17109ac50bcac944acd5652a91e516924d9fb425398f576fab56c68
interfaces.json2,13197bfc7164632849474dba0a2a098879e23d3d14af2328106080c88909f36743d
negative_controls.json1,355a901e880d92e4132a5b779daf145de8dba85e3328d1c173b25e3e3c2ccdf2a72
EXECUTION.json1,1695941d06714ac34c0be6b7747ca65d48e1d7718369db2bb6c138b948267ecfcbf
MANIFEST.json1,425ea8f3a17bc8a53296f215802d4e22281d0399379e857d14d185effa33e00a693
README.md1,5435609aa0158cdb86aa97a06b36bf8b21cd2c8ad04fc2b5f55541e7d71b6bca724
site EXECUTION.json1,2793ea605d25f591c49d460c6ce0a7ebe743d8664a2848ff6dadc599b9d02f9f951
earlier package ZIP26,4707b7ba1b75025f74451c5960793f88f6a4fa5b2fe08274bbe2a846636c5b6e649
evidence edition 1.1.0 ZIP254,71680d058b1807c4bb3b9ab7ba53163df3e18a5c0cb70ab2befb5cbbb2824f378e9
CONNECTIONS.json10,93375df2714b86fe76b844354cef39d2bc8d0c57fa503ab7f78e89c9cf6cee9460c
edition 1.1.0 stdout1,89567794f3070ab6a83c7c446762e7a22e5918c8bb4a4e126419b7ae07f6e8c83c1
edition 1.1.0 site execution1,26369dabbcf5e9d559df0c007eebe7745551212ea4c871bc2d75c0e5c9f4faef801
treeOS log 1.024,9410b7a7715e49f5519a9d1e5088ca11eab8c3f2bef202ecd85b72fa2753c451133
treeOS check.py15,833f31230bf8a31d45b91b637ba9aa2df42b9ec534c3a54baaca4205d90a077d5b7
treeOS stdout5626a20db4b8d0c8e35635dea4cd2e63c76fdbdb46bf4e728d319a1e1d5a9ce51cb
treeOS emitted matrices264,355f255ea42c41fec6bbcae5e242b2cf0f5540abd9e4454a7af8f3fc88e8cdddc28
treeOS site execution1,606779a25005d30262b980caa0383b5358f31b16d435ba7ef488a2d046cf678ed93
compact record v1.13,27615a2931cec9df25a7588417917f0817be75d3e9deb7dc5ba5337d163b3640b18
relationship index6,354255dd4b0d5236103866a8827605f39b4c5da04106dc812300d02a93e2040a396

The four earlier report files share one digest because their bytes are identical. The earlier package ZIP does not contain the site execution record. The edition 1.1.0 ZIP is a distinct file at a different path. A matching digest checks byte integrity. It does not itself verify that the recorded execution occurred or that the checker is mathematically correct.